In late August, the U. S. Department of Education released its guidance for ESEA Waiver Renewal. As many pundits have noted, Secretary Duncan attached more strings to states earning renewal of their waiver. As it stands, to get a two-year extension of their waivers, states must reaffirm their commitment to college and career ready standards, esea-flex3assessments aligned to those standards, and to the implementation of their designed and submitted system of differentiated accountability (with an expressed focus on closing achievement gaps). This is all expected fare, to be honest, both the focus and the new strings. Currently 41 states have waivers. The bulk of those (35) were granted in Rounds 1 and 2 of the waiver process and these states will be the first to run through the new drills to get their renewals. Continue reading
here is one line in the Department’s press release that is really interesting to me, “… (the Department’s renewal process) will also provide an opportunity for states to make necessary adjustments to their approved plans for improving student learning and the quality of instruction.” This is interesting to me because I wonder how far the Department will let states go with those adjustments. Will they allow waivers within a state’s waiver for programs like Kentucky’s Districts of Innovation? What about enabling states interested in moving towards competency education, like those in CCSSO’s Innovation Lab Network, to pilot parallel assessment and accountability systems for a subset of districts? It seems to me that if the Department is interested in allowing states to be truly innovative in the way we deliver education to our students, this waiver renewal process may be an important, and maybe their last, opportunity to do that. Continue reading
Democrats stood by their 1,000+ page bill which would largely stay the course on U.S. Education Secretary Arne Duncan’s waiver strategy. Republicans, on the other hand, made the case for a smaller federal presence in education. Despite these differences, there were some striking similarities among the two proposals which warrant some mention. Continue reading
It is clear, on multiple fronts, that there are many questions surrounding ESEA Waivers and their implementation in thirty-four states and the District of Columbia. Continue reading
in order to properly identify quality teaching, you should create an evaluation system that combines classroom observations, student surveys, and student achievement gains. Continue reading
What does the election outcome mean for ESEA? While on the surface it appears to be a status quo election it is important to take a closer look. In the Senate the ranking member, because of term limits, will move from Senator Mike Enzi to most likely Senator Lamar Alexander. This changes the dynamics in the Senate and allows for Senator Alexander, a former Secretary of Education, to be more vocal on issues, processes, and policies that he cares most about. Additionally, committee make up will shift and leadership (ranking members mostly) of subcommittees will change in the House. Could this open up an opportunity to move ESEA? Chairman Kline recently stated that the “urgency in my mind is still there.” We will see if the political will is there on both sides of aisle and in both chambers. Frankly, I put the odds at 2015 or later…sorry but I’m an edu-pessimist when it comes to ESEA.
The respected, D.C.-based education think-tank Ed Sector today released its long-awaited report on shared accountability, or collective impact, titled “Striving for Success: Shared Accountability and School Improvement.” For any community that is going through budget cuts, changes in academic standards, Continue reading
Barrington, RI is the kind of community that wants go from better to great, having collected a whole heap of awards for its quality of life and its fine schools. And so the community is always looking for ways to Continue reading
The dust has settled on the Administration’s ESEA waiver announcement, and aside from the Senate HELP Committee’s much anticipated ESEA mark-up, all eyes are on the states as they weigh next steps. I suspect there will be a pack of frontrunners, a hefty number of wait and see states, and a few that would rather risk it all than spend months shuffling paper with the Administration and its peer review team.
Given this impending deadline, KnowledgeWorks has put together a bucket list for state waiver applications that reflects the principles embedded in our World of Learning work. These recommendations are meant to breathe new life into an education system that has seen better days. Continue reading
Sure, its old news. But if you dig a little deeper, you just might find something new and interesting in the definition.
The Administration defines student growth as the change in achievement for an individual student between two or more points in time. The announcement goes on to define student achievement for tested grades and subjects as a student’s score on the required state assessments. But the Administration did not stop there. It went on to say that these scores may include results from other measures of student learning provided they are rigorous and comparable across schools and within a school district. Some of the examples include results on pre-tests, end-of-course tests, and objective performance-based assessments. Wow. Take that standardized test fanatics. The U.S. Department of Education just gave states the opportunity to move away from 100% reliance on the state Math and English Language Arts tests. Continue reading